Archive for the ‘Media’ Category
Another World Food Crisis?
The United Nations’ food agency issued an alert on Tuesday warning that a severe drought was threatening the wheat crop in China, the world’s largest wheat producer, and resulting in shortages of drinking water for people and livestock.
China has been essentially self-sufficient in grain for decades, for national security reasons. Any move by China to import large quantities of food in response to the drought could drive international prices even higher than the record levels recently reached.
My biggest concern is that such droughts could trigger another world food crisis. Of course, you can’t evaluate how likely that scenario is, because there’s no mention of the food crisis of ’07 and ’08. People in the U.S. are more or less completely oblivious that for most of the developing the world, economic catastrophe started before the ’08 financial crisis. The ’07-’08 food crisis is one of the biggest unreported stories of our times. That’s not going to change anytime soon with our current media.
Video of the Day
When I get depressed about the prospects of liberalism in the U.S., I always feel better after watching this video:
Now if only we could get Democratic politicians to start talking like that.
Cable News in the Developing World
I found the coverage of the Chilean mining disaster disconcerting, but could not really put a finger on why. I found it vaguely wrong to swoop in and do a media blitzkrieg on the successful resolution of the collapse, when so many greater systemic tragedies occur all the time in Latin America, and elsewhere, in the developing world. I had no good way of explaining this notion any better. Maura R. O’Connor, however, articulates this line of thinking much better and uses the ongoing disaster in Haiti as an example:
CNN’s twenty-four-hour coverage of the aftermath of Haiti’s earthquake, which took an estimated 300,000 lives, doubled the network’s viewership. This coverage undoubtedly played a role in the America public’s response to the tragedy—one out of two Americans donated money to aid organizations. But little reporting has been done since then that asks how exactly that money is being spent, holds aid organizations accountable to their promises, or investigates the American government’s development and economic policies in the country. These policies, argues sociologist Alex Dupuy, have kept Haiti frozen in a destructive cycle of aid-dependence and exploitation for decades, stripping Haiti of its self-determination. “For the level of tragedy, no one’s really being very honest,” said Michael Fairbanks, a development expert, of the American and international community’s rhetoric about Haiti since the earthquake. “[Haitians] are constantly put into the position of adolescence and being infantilized so they can prey on the charity from the rest of the hemisphere.”
The longer American news outlets ignore these critical and complex issues, the easier it will become to view their occasional jaunts to Haiti with cynicism: it’s an convenient place to get B-roll of tragedy and disaster. Their coverage increases viewership, but without a moral component of responsibility towards Haitians themselves over the long-term, such coverage is basically exploitative. And over time, superficial reporting on Haiti’s problems—which plays a role in soliciting charitable donations from Americans-will arguably make the media culpable in the very system of aid-dependence and misguided development policies that help keep Haiti poor.
The Information Engulfs
For when you’re too lazy to read your blogs, there’s tldr.it. You can compress a feed or summarize a URL, depending on your energy.
The Vacuity of the Broadcast Industries
Mark Zuckerberg comments that Hollywood seemed to have trouble understanding that he didn’t want to create Facebook to get a girl, but just because it would be satisfying to create the website. This shuttered view of humanity extends way beyond Silicon Valley, and finds its purest form in cable news. According to the well-worn narrative, it’s almost unimaginable that someone in politics does something, because it’s the right thing to do. Rather, one is always motivated because it helps you somehow in the political horserace, or it’s a mistake and blunder. It’s a rather sad view of the world, where no one does anything unless it directly betters themselves vis-a-vis other people.
Human relationships are important. In fact, they might be the most fulfilling aspect of civilization. But, other things motivate people to do things, even if they are abstract notions we don’t all share.
Only The Best!
Google has a tour of the web.
Leave a Comment