The Ant Trade’s Consequences

The ant trade is the name for the trickle of guns that flow south to Mexico as drugs come north.  It’s called that, because traditionally, only a handful of guns cross the border in any single arms run.  Done enough times, however, and the flow of arms can be quite large.  Hence the image of ants crossing the border all with several weapons.  It seems that trickle has increased greatly in the past few years:

No other state has produced more guns seized by police in the brutal Mexican drug wars than Texas. In the Lone Star State, no other city has more guns linked to Mexican crime scenes than Houston. And in the Texas oil town, no single independent dealer stands out more for selling guns traced from south of the border than Bill Carter.

Carter, 76, has operated four Carter’s Country stores in the Houston metropolitan area over the past half-century. In the past two years, more than 115 guns from his stores have been seized by the police and military in Mexico.

As an unprecedented number of American guns flows to the murderous drug cartels across the border, the identities of U.S. dealers that sell guns seized at Mexican crime scenes remain confidential under a law passed by Congress in 2003.

A year-long investigation by The Washington Post has cracked that secrecy and uncovered the names of the top 12 U.S. dealers of guns traced to Mexico in the past two years.

Eight of the top 12 dealers are in Texas, three are in Arizona, and one is in California. In Texas, two of the four Houston area Carter’s Country stores are on the list, along with four gun retailers in the Rio Grande Valley at the southern tip of the state. There are 3,800 gun retailers in Texas, 300 in Houston alone.

“One of the reasons that Houston is the number one source, you can go to a different gun store for a month and never hit the same gun store,” said J. Dewey Webb, special agent in charge of the Houston field division of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. “You can buy [a 9mm handgun] down along the border, but if you come to Houston, you can probably buy it cheaper because there’s more dealers, there’s more competition.”

Drug cartels have aggressively turned to the United States because Mexico severely restricts gun ownership. Following gunrunning paths that have been in place for 50 years, firearms cross the border and end up in the hands of criminals as well as ordinary citizens seeking protection.

“This is not a new phenomenon,” Webb said.

What is different now, authorities say, is the number of high-powered rifles heading south – AR-15s, AK-47s, armor-piercing .50-caliber weapons – and the savagery of the violence.

Federal authorities say more than 60,000 U.S. guns of all types have been recovered in Mexico in the past four years, helping fuel the violence that has contributed to 30,000 deaths. Mexican President Felipe Calderon came to Washington in May and urged Congress and President Obama to stop the flow of guns south.

U.S. law enforcement has ramped up its focus on gun trafficking along the southwestern border. Arrests of individual gunrunners have surged. But investigators rarely bring regulatory actions or criminal cases against U.S. gun dealers, in part because of laws backed by the gun lobby that make it difficult to prove cases.

First, a big problem here is there’s a politically powerful vested interest that profits from arming the drug cartels. The U.S., generally, is very good about controlling the flow of our military arms, but it seems the security state is turning a blind eye to this problem. Second, as crime has continued to decrease in the U.S. despite the recession, the increase in violence in Mexico may be the actual consequence of the lapsing of the assault weapons ban.  I’ll also just note that border states have particularly lenient gun ownership laws, which no doubt helps fuel the ant trade.  I wonder when this problem will create enough political pressure to change current gun policy.


Conservatives at Red State, of course, have a genuinely insane idea related to this: invade Mexico.

The Ant Trade’s Consequences

Bolivia-U.S. Relations

I find it somewhat unnerving how drastic the escalation of reprisals were between the U.S. and Bolivia in late 2008.  The Obama administration brought hope for a change in U.S. policy.  And the Obama administration quickly restored relations with Venezuela, but Bolivian relations languished.  I think the main take-away is that Bolivia is a complete geopolitical backwater, and essentially a non-existent trade partner for the U.S., so the importance of any bilateral business with Bolivia is low on the totem pole.  Venezuela has oil, which increases its strategic importance to the U.S.  This gives Venezuela a greater ability to make things difficult for the U.S., but also gives the U.S. greater incentive to make the relationship work at some level.  Bolivia, in contrast, really does not offer the U.S. much either way.  Although trade with the U.S. is crucial for Bolivia, the reverse is not true; Bolivia is just too small of a country.  Hopefully, this is a sign that the U.S. has the time to give some thought to talking directly to Bolivia again.

Bolivia-U.S. Relations

Shorter George Will: judicial activism which produces conservative policy results I like is merely judicial engagement.  Judicial activism that produces liberal results I don’t like is judicial activism.

“There is,” Willett explains, “a profound difference between an activist judge and an engaged judge.” The former creates rights not specified or implied by the Constitution. The latter defends rights the Framers actually placed there and prevents the elected branches from usurping the judiciary’s duty to declare what the Constitution means. Let us hope the Supreme Court justices are engaged when considering the insurance mandate.